mrane1
10-15 03:36 AM
hi everyone
I m an MBA(major:general mba)student in a university in texas. I have an bachelors of engineeing (electrical & electronics)from india. I have found an desi employer who is ready to train me in SAP (FICO)functional and than place me on projects to diffeent companies. Since i m graduating in august 2008 ,At first i have to work for him on OPT and than in apil 2009 my employer will sponcer my h1 visa.
Now my question is....
1) can i work in SAP FICO functional , when i m on my opt?(opt means i have to work in a job directly related to my major field of study and i guess SAP is not related to my field major field of study)
2)will i have problems getting a h1b visa? (since General MBA and SAP are completely different fields )
Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated.
thanks
very simple answers
1) Yes
2) No
I m an MBA(major:general mba)student in a university in texas. I have an bachelors of engineeing (electrical & electronics)from india. I have found an desi employer who is ready to train me in SAP (FICO)functional and than place me on projects to diffeent companies. Since i m graduating in august 2008 ,At first i have to work for him on OPT and than in apil 2009 my employer will sponcer my h1 visa.
Now my question is....
1) can i work in SAP FICO functional , when i m on my opt?(opt means i have to work in a job directly related to my major field of study and i guess SAP is not related to my field major field of study)
2)will i have problems getting a h1b visa? (since General MBA and SAP are completely different fields )
Any comments or suggestions will be appreciated.
thanks
very simple answers
1) Yes
2) No
wallpaper Kristen Stewart and Robert
himu73
07-03 10:34 AM
If for a moment we say USCIS has really increased the processing rate and more people are getting green cards which we see is the case. It may signal that on Oct 1st,2007 dates will move ahead of what was the scenario in May visa bulletin.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
irukandji
02-14 10:21 AM
will the GC be still valid after converting to H1B? or will it be rejected? even after AC21 has been invoked by the new employer...
2011 kristen stewart hot kiss.
reddymjm
05-15 06:34 AM
If your I-140 gets approved when you are already in the sixth year, can you still seek the 3 year extension?
Yes U can.
Yes U can.
more...
needhelp!
02-14 12:34 PM
Lets send our love to the WH!
pappu
02-01 10:32 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/FREQUENTLY_ASKED_QUESTIONS/AC21_FAQ
also check a past blog i wrote few months ago--
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?b=11
also check a past blog i wrote few months ago--
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/blog.php?b=11
more...
dionysus
01-23 02:14 PM
Dates are valid as of November 30, 2008. Texas is processing July 11, 2007 applications. Looks good. It means CIS finally has time to work on the deluge of applications they received in July 2007, even though the dates are not current yet. The approvals may still be far off, but at least we know that our apps are being worked upon.
2010 images kristen stewart hot
desitechie
07-23 12:32 PM
You can take time off -- like 4 weeks without any issue (I have done this), as long as the new company has filed to transfer your H1B petition.
I guess you should avoid going out of status -- where the old company has revoked your H1B when the new company hasn't even filed the H1B transfer petition. Other than this, taking time off between jobs should not be any problem at all, provided you stay within the country and, no travel outside the US. But if you do, you should consult your lawyer about its implications. Good luck with your new endeavors.
Sri.
Thanks
I guess you should avoid going out of status -- where the old company has revoked your H1B when the new company hasn't even filed the H1B transfer petition. Other than this, taking time off between jobs should not be any problem at all, provided you stay within the country and, no travel outside the US. But if you do, you should consult your lawyer about its implications. Good luck with your new endeavors.
Sri.
Thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmnlTcu2M7ZRvbgua5-jJpW-aejPMnpd7hLz-dOI4gTX3D1QLf1xkMhrwssM8WSTqyZzi2WBmUwFS4qNOF1sPCD4hF1LWq7qMhPAgBYNNH159-Aq0fpg9p53B2ad3vA7mTWOUrhYcj2Os/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmnlTcu2M7ZRvbgua5-jJpW-aejPMnpd7hLz-dOI4gTX3D1QLf1xkMhrwssM8WSTqyZzi2WBmUwFS4qNOF1sPCD4hF1LWq7qMhPAgBYNNH159-Aq0fpg9p53B2ad3vA7mTWOUrhYcj2Os/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmnlTcu2M7ZRvbgua5-jJpW-aejPMnpd7hLz-dOI4gTX3D1QLf1xkMhrwssM8WSTqyZzi2WBmUwFS4qNOF1sPCD4hF1LWq7qMhPAgBYNNH159-Aq0fpg9p53B2ad3vA7mTWOUrhYcj2Os/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhmnlTcu2M7ZRvbgua5-jJpW-aejPMnpd7hLz-dOI4gTX3D1QLf1xkMhrwssM8WSTqyZzi2WBmUwFS4qNOF1sPCD4hF1LWq7qMhPAgBYNNH159-Aq0fpg9p53B2ad3vA7mTWOUrhYcj2Os/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
hair hot Kristen Stewart kristen
laksmi
01-30 10:51 AM
yes, Better you sponsor
more...
paskal
08-27 01:56 PM
Pezz,
I hope you get some good suggestions- just a little thing- your attorney does not have to be located where you are, a lot of people deal long distance!
Please don't forget to join your state chapter and sign up for the rally. We are counting on a strong presence from the Philadelphia area and indeed all PA!
I hope you get some good suggestions- just a little thing- your attorney does not have to be located where you are, a lot of people deal long distance!
Please don't forget to join your state chapter and sign up for the rally. We are counting on a strong presence from the Philadelphia area and indeed all PA!
hot Kristen Stewart too hot
Didiusthegreat
10-08 12:47 PM
No problem, Here, you've got it
more...
house Kristen Stewart and Robert
PDOCT05
10-01 02:55 PM
But mine is not. Applied thru the same lawyer on 3rd july. anyone else whose checks were cleared or seen any activity at all.....
Wait..wait...wait..until u r turn comes ...:)
Wait..wait...wait..until u r turn comes ...:)
tattoo kristen stewart hot kiss.
conundrum
12-18 04:15 PM
Unless the dependent is going to have his 140 filed under EB1 I am not sure it would help.
But to answer your question, I think it is ok to file. Check with your attorney before you do that though
But to answer your question, I think it is ok to file. Check with your attorney before you do that though
more...
pictures Gorgeous photos of Kristen
.jpg "kristen stewart hot kiss")
Michael chertoff
03-08 11:53 AM
Please see your PM
Please share the information with everybody. I am also in same situation.
Thanks
MC
Please share the information with everybody. I am also in same situation.
Thanks
MC
dresses kristen stewart hot kiss.
DSLStart
01-08 10:51 AM
You can stay out of the US for up to 6 months with no consequence, as long as the person has a vaild green card and passport. Over 6 months contact with the US consulate is needed and the green card holder can stay out of the country for up to a year. Over a year the green card holder will forfeit their green card and not be allowed to re-enter the country.
The US permanent resident CAN stay out of the country for more than a year if they apply for and are granted a re-entry permit by USCIS prior to leaving the country. However, for a PR to become a citizen, he/she must have 5 years of continuous residency and staying abroad for more than a year will typically break it regardless of whether a re-entry permit is issued/used.
after all there is no departure date stamped in my passport? do the airlines inform INS of passenger departure dates? does INS keep a record of departure dates of green card holders in their computers?
i know that the immigration officer at the port of entry asks "How long have u been outside the US?" In my case it will be one year and one week so can i just say "about a year"
The US permanent resident CAN stay out of the country for more than a year if they apply for and are granted a re-entry permit by USCIS prior to leaving the country. However, for a PR to become a citizen, he/she must have 5 years of continuous residency and staying abroad for more than a year will typically break it regardless of whether a re-entry permit is issued/used.
after all there is no departure date stamped in my passport? do the airlines inform INS of passenger departure dates? does INS keep a record of departure dates of green card holders in their computers?
i know that the immigration officer at the port of entry asks "How long have u been outside the US?" In my case it will be one year and one week so can i just say "about a year"
more...
makeup Robert Pattinson and Kristen
rajnag21
07-05 11:52 AM
Hi All,
Is no one willing to share information with me ?
Is no one willing to share information with me ?
girlfriend hot Kristen Stewart Twilight
coldcloud
08-06 02:28 AM
Thanks nlssubbu for the info. And yes it is 2010 and i have edited the post.
hairstyles kristen stewart wallpapers in
st4rguitar
04-06 01:53 PM
In my employer company (NJ based, desi consulting company) about 50% of the EB-2 PERM applications are under audit.
I need to file my application for EB-2 and I called them. (I have a EB-3 approved labor, on which my employer has filed I-140)
The paralegal advised me that they have stopped filing PERM applications since this month March 2008, hoping that there would be change of PERM processing or application change.
Does any one have any info about PERM change process? Please advise. Thanks in advance.
The DOL was supposed to issue new forms, since the current ones were said to expire in 3/2008. However, they have not issued new forms yet, and on their website it states that the current ones continue to be valid. Their site was down for maintenance around the end of March, however, so perhaps that's what the paralegal was referring to?
I need to file my application for EB-2 and I called them. (I have a EB-3 approved labor, on which my employer has filed I-140)
The paralegal advised me that they have stopped filing PERM applications since this month March 2008, hoping that there would be change of PERM processing or application change.
Does any one have any info about PERM change process? Please advise. Thanks in advance.
The DOL was supposed to issue new forms, since the current ones were said to expire in 3/2008. However, they have not issued new forms yet, and on their website it states that the current ones continue to be valid. Their site was down for maintenance around the end of March, however, so perhaps that's what the paralegal was referring to?
geniousatwork
03-31 05:15 PM
I believe your sister can apply for you int he 4th Family based category.
Below is the family based catgory, you can find this in any visa bulletin too.
FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES
First: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.
Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent
Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, and any unused first preference numbers:
A. Spouses and Children: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;
B. Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older): 23% of the overall second preference limitation.
Third: Married Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.
Fourth: Brothers and Sisters of Adult Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.
I am not very sure if dual application is possible.
Below is the family based catgory, you can find this in any visa bulletin too.
FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCES
First: Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400 plus any numbers not required for fourth preference.
Second: Spouses and Children, and Unmarried Sons and Daughters of Permanent
Residents: 114,200, plus the number (if any) by which the worldwide family preference level exceeds 226,000, and any unused first preference numbers:
A. Spouses and Children: 77% of the overall second preference limitation, of which 75% are exempt from the per-country limit;
B. Unmarried Sons and Daughters (21 years of age or older): 23% of the overall second preference limitation.
Third: Married Sons and Daughters of Citizens: 23,400, plus any numbers not required by first and second preferences.
Fourth: Brothers and Sisters of Adult Citizens: 65,000, plus any numbers not required by first three preferences.
I am not very sure if dual application is possible.
subba
01-03 03:10 PM
In general, I see a lot of members quoting stuff that indicates shortage of tech workers and saying we should use them.
While this is true, it is worth understanding/appreciating the fact that most of these articles are aimed towards increasing H1 quota and not necessarily improving EB retrogression.
We should be a little careful which articles we use.
Hi,
The following is an article I read and want to share with fellow GC seekers. This clearly indicates that there is a real big need for Tech workers in US and companies are finding difficult to fill the vacancies.
http://www.datawarehouse.com/article/?articleid=6816
I hope IV may be able to get in touch with researcher and get more detailed information. This may also help them while meeting House Reps and Congressmen.
nlssubbu
While this is true, it is worth understanding/appreciating the fact that most of these articles are aimed towards increasing H1 quota and not necessarily improving EB retrogression.
We should be a little careful which articles we use.
Hi,
The following is an article I read and want to share with fellow GC seekers. This clearly indicates that there is a real big need for Tech workers in US and companies are finding difficult to fill the vacancies.
http://www.datawarehouse.com/article/?articleid=6816
I hope IV may be able to get in touch with researcher and get more detailed information. This may also help them while meeting House Reps and Congressmen.
nlssubbu
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario